Aha! Double, double cross etc. Good to know.
I'm running historics anyway - early 60's. And what a pain that is for an ever-diminishing list of tyres. I can claim a 'historic exemption', but see individuals just taking the piss. And the idea that tyres are OK one year but not the next is an ...
Search found 3 matches
- Mon Aug 10, 2026 7:10 pm
- Forum: Rules and Regs
- Topic: Review of ‘E’ marked tyres
- Replies: 13
- Views: 83081
- Mon Aug 10, 2026 2:03 pm
- Forum: Rules and Regs
- Topic: Review of ‘E’ marked tyres
- Replies: 13
- Views: 83081
Re: Review of ‘E’ marked tyres
Maybe a wee bit of a typo in the draft. The 'pre-1990' limitation relating to selected List 1B tyres is about the vehicle rather than the tyres isn't it?
"EU Regulation 1222/2009 for tyre labelling exempts tyres designed for use on cars first registered before the 1st October 1990, therefore a ...
"EU Regulation 1222/2009 for tyre labelling exempts tyres designed for use on cars first registered before the 1st October 1990, therefore a ...
- Sat May 09, 2026 8:08 pm
- Forum: Rules and Regs
- Topic: Review of ‘E’ marked tyres
- Replies: 13
- Views: 83081
Re: Review of ‘E’ marked tyres
13" looks easy, compared to 14"...
Even 14's from List 1A that I used to run, disappeared from the list subsequently - although the tyre remains available. A move that widened choice would be very welcome before I have to buy another set of more expensive Yokohamas from 1B that are inferior when ...
Even 14's from List 1A that I used to run, disappeared from the list subsequently - although the tyre remains available. A move that widened choice would be very welcome before I have to buy another set of more expensive Yokohamas from 1B that are inferior when ...
